August 23, 2018
Russian Legal Experts Prepare Amusing Document Noting That Trump “Fixer” Michael Cohen Wasn’t Actually Charged With Any Election Crimes
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
In support of yesterday’s Security Council (SC) report asserting that the events currently embroiling the “Deep State” faction in the United States surrounding the so called “guilty plea agreement” admitted to by Trump “fixer” Michael Cohen—wherein he pled guilty to “illegal interference” in the 2016 US presidential election by paying “hush money” to keep hidden the extramarital affairs of Trump—is nothing more than a masterful President Donald Trump choreographed “Trump Trap” devised and executed by former top Deutsche Bank official, and now US Deputy Attorney Robert Khuzami—a new document circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by American legal experts within the Administrative Directorate of the President (ADP) amusingly details that Cohen actually wasn’t charged with any crimes as it pertains to his “election interference” charges—as this US federal document against him doesn’t contain a single criminal charge against him, only legal “mumble jumble”. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
The most amusing thing about this ADF document (at least to us) examining the “guilty plea agreement” signed by Michel Cohen is the preface that describes it using the old Soviet joke “Which is more useful, a Communist radio broadcast or a Communist newspaper? The newspaper, of course... you can use it to wrap herring.”—but whose details of present a very perplexing puzzle indeed—and that are:
In a 21 August 2018 letter sent to Michael Cohn attorney Guy Petrillo from the US Department of Justice, US Deputy Attorney Robert Khuzami outlines 8 Criminal Counts that he expected Cohn to plead guilty to, and in exchange for doing so, Cohn was promised that he would receive no further criminal charges against him—with Counts 1-6 describing in detail the exact US federal laws Cohn had broken as it related to his illegally profiteering off of his New York City taxi cab company, and failing to pay taxes, and his lying on a bank loan application.
As Counts 1-6 of Cohen’s indictment letter described in full detail the exact US federal laws that were violated by him, this document notes that Russian legal experts on America law were shocked to discover that Counts 7 and 8 citied no laws at all that Cohen had violated—with Count 7, that stated Cohen “willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution” only citing US federal laws 52 U.S.C. 30118(a), 30109(d)(I)(A) and 18 U.S.C. 2(b)—and Count 8, that stated Cohen “made an excessive campaign contribution”, only citing 52 U.S.C. 30116(a)(I)(A), 30116(a)(7), 30109(d)(I)(A) and 18 U.S.C. 2(b)—thus meaning that when Cohen pled guilty to Counts 7 and 8, he actually pled guilty to nothing at all.
To why this is a fact, this document explains, are because the US federal laws cited in Count 7 are not actually laws that can be broken—as U.S. Code: Title 52 - VOTING AND ELECTIONS is only the main chapter heading of US election laws—30118(a) is only a general instruction, not a law—30109(d)(I)(A) is not a law that can be broken as it only outlines procedures—and 18 U.S. Code 2(b) is not a law that can be broken as it only defines the definition of “principal”.
Count 8, as in Count 7, this document explains, again cites 30109(d)(I)(A) and 18 U.S. Code 2(b), neither of which are laws that can be broken as they only describe a procedure and a definition—but adds 30116(a)(I)(A), that only states campaign contributions cannot exceed $2,000—and 30116(a)(7), that is the only law cited in either Counts 7 and 8 that can be broken—but contains 8 separate violations that would have been impossible for Cohen to violate simultaneously—and under “normal” US federal criminal procedures would have had the exact criminal charge being specified—such as 30116(a)(7)(D) that makes illegal “Contributions made to or for the benefit of any candidate nominated by a political party for election to the office of Vice President of the United States shall be considered to be contributions made to or for the benefit of the candidate of such party for election to the office of President of the United States”.
With the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guaranteeing Michal Cohen (and every other US citizen for that matter) the right to know the exact law he violated, this document says, perversely this guaranteed legal protection doesn’t pertain to “guilty plea agreements”—and that within US prosecutors can make any charge they want, even those not based on any laws as they know they will never be litigated and subject judicial review—and by Cohen signing his “guilty plea agreement”, US Deputy Attorney Khuzami assured would never happen as Cohn had to, also, give up his right to appeal any of these 8 Counts made against him.
This document concludes by noting that these findings of fact by ADP experts on American law regarding Counts 7 and 8 against Michal Cohn, that citied no US laws he had broken, has been confirmed as being accurate by Harvard Law School constitutional scholar and US federal law legal giant Alan Dershowitz—who in his railing against those falsely claiming that Cohn’s guilty plea in anyway affected President Trump, declared that no laws had broken, and slammed back at his detractors by daring them to “Show me the stature!”.
United Sates Constitution legal giant Alan Dershowitz fires grave warning to the American people in his new book “Trumped Up: How Criminalization of Political Differences Endangers Democracy”
1 post • Page 1 of 1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 7:29 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest